Pics

[kneo69]

Question: Why can you only have a pic that is 800 x 600? Why can't it go the other way too? 600 x 800? I sometimes end up having to crop the tops or bottoms (mmmm bottoms!:D ) off to make them fit. Just a q? TIA

[Yian]

Emmm.... my question is why we can't just control the file size of the pic, and that's it; isn't that the only thing that matters when it comes to the bandwidth?

[kneo69]

That's what i thought!:confused:

[kneo69]

Ok it's been almost 10 days, i want an answer from some sort of mod or SUPPORT person about this, it's pissin me off, i know it's a luxury to post pics, but if i have resize another 600 x 800 picture i will go INSANE! I just don't get it i gues, please 'splain, or at least acknowledge SOMETHING! TIA

[RADiator]

Originally posted by Yian
Emmm.... my question is why we can't just control the file size of the pic, and that's it; isn't that the only thing that matters when it comes to the bandwidth? Well no it’s not the only thing. The size of the image itself plays quite a big role. Anything that is bigger than 800X600 will still load awfully slow on 56k modems even though it can be a small size image.

[kneo69]

I still don't see the difference between 800x600 & 600x800!?:confused: :(

[JerraMaya]

Originally posted by kneo69
I still don't see the difference between 800x600 & 600x800!?:confused: :(

cant u c the difference isnt it obvious ???????????

[kneo69]

That's not what i meant!:rolleyes: