PDA

View Full Version : Science & Religion


TheKua
July 31st, 2004, 09:44 PM
Which do you think will be the ultimate victor in the end? all views are welcome.

karny
July 31st, 2004, 11:30 PM
Originally posted by TheKua
Which do you think will be the ultimate victor in the end? all views are welcome.

I believe your mum will be the victor, i mean to be able to put up with bullshit like that she must have an will made of something stronger than dimond!

JerraMaya
July 31st, 2004, 11:31 PM
lol :D

TheKua
July 31st, 2004, 11:54 PM
Originally posted by karny
I believe your mum will be the victor, i mean to be able to put up with bullshit like that she must have an will made of something stronger than dimond!

well somewhere along the lines of diamond but thats irrelavent.

Hobbes874
August 1st, 2004, 11:06 AM
Both will fail and in the end we will all die horrible horrible deaths........with karny's mum.

Silence
August 1st, 2004, 11:17 AM
well i have allways believed in science more, because well, alot of Religious facts ( god greated the world, humans were "put together" by god, ) have been pushed down by science. and for comparing these two you should be kicked in the nuts. but with the mix of both of them we will Die all sooon, the day will come.

future man
August 1st, 2004, 11:17 AM
Originally posted by TheKua
well somewhere along the lines of diamond but thats irrelavent.

Irrelavent, is that sort of like irrelavant? Your thread sucks, look at it die.

Docta Beeeer
August 1st, 2004, 03:16 PM
Ultimate victor in the end as in which will kill us first, or which will triumph over the other?

Yian
August 1st, 2004, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by TheKua
Which do you think will be the ultimate victor in the end? all views are welcome.
Kua, that sounds so retarded!!! It's like Science and Religion are waging wars against each other... When did that ever happen?

karny
August 1st, 2004, 05:23 PM
Originally posted by Yian
When did that ever happen?

When his daddy started putting his pee pee in his poo poo hole, it caused him to doubt the existance of god, and believe that a gun would solve his problem better.

There we have it folks the ultimate personification of god vs science... god certainly won't help but a gun will! Science pwn's GOD!

r3n.d4n73
August 1st, 2004, 06:01 PM
Originally posted by TheKua
Which do you think will be the ultimate victor in the end? all views are welcome.

Well, God DID create all of the laws of science. Man only discovered them.

karny
August 1st, 2004, 06:17 PM
my question is, if the monkeys evolve into something like neanderthalls will you religious fanatics agree and say that people evolved and didn't come from adamn and eve or will you call it witch craft etc

TheKua
August 1st, 2004, 06:27 PM
Originally posted by Yian
Kua, that sounds so retarded!!! It's like Science and Religion are waging wars against each other... When did that ever happen?

Well that is kind of true Science and Religion have been at each others throats lately..probably not on the battlefield but in the boardrooms most definately.

future man
August 1st, 2004, 09:16 PM
Originally posted by karny
my question is, if the monkeys evolve into something like neanderthalls will you religious fanatics agree and say that people evolved and didn't come from adamn and eve or will you call it witch craft etc

I asked my mom that same question, her stupid ass answer was, "That would just be Satan's trickery" or something stupid like that.

r3n.d4n73
August 1st, 2004, 09:17 PM
Originally posted by karny
my question is, if the monkeys evolve into something like neanderthalls will you religious fanatics agree and say that people evolved and didn't come from adamn and eve or will you call it witch craft etc

If they evolove? Well, if evolution happened, it would have happened a while ago right? (yes). But since it didnt happen, I would say that that theory is wrong.

JerraMaya
August 1st, 2004, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by r3n.d4n73
If they evolove? Well, if evolution happened, it would have happened a while ago right? (yes). But since it didnt happen, I would say that that theory is wrong.
thats coz your eating too much patatoes with coke

karny
August 1st, 2004, 09:47 PM
Originally posted by r3n.d4n73
If they evolove? Well, if evolution happened, it would have happened a while ago right? (yes). But since it didnt happen, I would say that that theory is wrong.

It did happen a while ago and WE came from it!

Freakonaleash89
August 3rd, 2004, 02:58 PM
The thing that has always puzzled me about evolution is why they haven't found more missing links between animals. If all this evolution took place, you would think there would be some remains of the animals in the intermediate stages.

karny
August 3rd, 2004, 03:59 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
The thing that has always puzzled me about evolution is why they haven't found more missing links between animals. If all this evolution took place, you would think there would be some remains of the animals in the intermediate stages.

uhhhh neanderthalls.... ???

you know sloapy forheads drags knuckles... like the asians of today....

JerraMaya
August 3rd, 2004, 04:19 PM
Originally posted by karny
uhhhh neanderthalls.... ???

you know sloapy forheads drags knuckles... like the asians of today....
hey have you played DOOM 3 yet or not ? :eek:


*J sneaks away* :p

Freakonaleash89
August 3rd, 2004, 05:15 PM
Originally posted by karny
uhhhh neanderthalls.... ???

you know sloapy forheads drags knuckles... like the asians of today....

Hey there are some pretty fucked looking people alive today, the neanderthalls are hardly proof of evolution. And besides, I thought it was a known fact that african americans were the missing link, not asians.

Docta Beeeer
August 3rd, 2004, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by karny
uhhhh neanderthalls.... ???

you know sloapy forheads drags knuckles... like the asians of today....
We did not evolve from the neandrethals you're thinking of. We are a part of a different species. The neandrethals had thicker skulls and bigger brains and everything but it's been proven that we did not evolve from them.

Smapdey
August 3rd, 2004, 05:32 PM
Freak, you're a god damn idiot. There are so many things wrong with your argument I want to throw up.

Freakonaleash89
August 3rd, 2004, 05:33 PM
Originally posted by Docta Beeeer
We did not evolve from the neandrethals you're thinking of. We are a part of a different species. The neandrethals had thicker skulls and bigger brains and everything but it's been proven that we did not evolve from them.

Almost anything can be "proven" nowadays.

Docta Beeeer
August 3rd, 2004, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
Almost anything can be "proven" nowadays.
Prove it.

karny
August 3rd, 2004, 10:54 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
Almost anything can be "proven" nowadays.

I'm assuming that the quote marks mean, nothing is definate but once the world was known to be flat, now it's known to be round... am i getting warmer or are you a fool?

Freakonaleash89
August 4th, 2004, 08:26 PM
Originally posted by karny
I'm assuming that the quote marks mean, nothing is definate but once the world was known to be flat, now it's known to be round... am i getting warmer or are you a fool?

That's exactly the kind of thing I was meaning by those quote marks.

Smapdey
August 4th, 2004, 09:32 PM
Freak, things have to have some basis in fact. Otherwise the laws of the universe come crashing down and we are left with nothing. We need to accept some things as being proven. If you hit your mother, and it leaves a bruise, it can be proven that you did it. And you did in fact do it. You display an incredibly amount of ignorance concerning evolution, I would suggest that you avoid further discussion on the topic until you have become educated and accustomed to that latest theories.

Hobbes874
August 4th, 2004, 09:55 PM
What the fuck is evo-lution?

karny
August 5th, 2004, 03:19 PM
Originally posted by Hobbes874
What the fuck is evo-lution?

It's a car made by Mitsubishi, it basically is awesome and really really fast, christians hate it because it's named after some theory some dude called charles babbage or darwin (the dolphin maybe) made up

DanTheMan
August 5th, 2004, 03:24 PM
Originally posted by Hobbes874
What the fuck is evo-lution?

Lancer Evo (http://www.autogaleria.sitenet.pl/tapety/img/mitsubishi/mitsubishi_lancer_evo_vii_2001_02_m.jpg)

r3n.d4n73
August 5th, 2004, 09:45 PM
The only Neanderthal skelatons they found were actually proved to be apes. :p. nubs. Also, they use the geological column to prove, where the fossils date the rocks, and the rocks date the fossils. Do you see anything wront with that? Also, the geological column has never been found on earth as evolutionists say it is.

Smapdey
August 5th, 2004, 10:57 PM
Originally posted by r3n.d4n73
The only Neanderthal skelatons they found were actually proved to be apes. :p. nubs. Also, they use the geological column to prove, where the fossils date the rocks, and the rocks date the fossils. Do you see anything wront with that? Also, the geological column has never been found on earth as evolutionists say it is.

Sources you god damn moron? Accredited sources?

Freakonaleash89
August 6th, 2004, 03:24 PM
I think the guy is right, but I would still like to see some sources so I can see for myself.

Smap, why do you always feel the need to call people morons when they don't cite sources or don't state their opinions as well as you are able to?

JerraMaya
August 6th, 2004, 04:20 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
ISmap, why do you always feel the need to call people morons when they don't cite sources or don't state their opinions as well as you are able to?
Coz he is a MORON ;)

Docta Beeeer
August 6th, 2004, 04:36 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
I think the guy is right, but I would still like to see some sources so I can see for myself.

Smap, why do you always feel the need to call people morons when they don't cite sources or don't state their opinions as well as you are able to?
Because he's been brainwashed by the MLA.

Smapdey
August 7th, 2004, 09:45 AM
What the hell is the MLA?

Well Freak, I'm calling you a moron because I happen to know that your crackpot theory is wrong and you know nothing of the topic.

Freakonaleash89
August 7th, 2004, 06:41 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
What the hell is the MLA?

Well Freak, I'm calling you a moron because I happen to know that your crackpot theory is wrong and you know nothing of the topic.

What theory? Where did I post a theory?

jesuskingofpeace
August 7th, 2004, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
What theory? Where did I post a theory?

Well, you are denying the existence of evolution, which is even dumber than any theory that your little brain could think up.

Docta Beeeer
August 7th, 2004, 07:06 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
What the hell is the MLA?
http://www.mla.org/

I'm surprised you don't know about it.

Freakonaleash89
August 7th, 2004, 09:00 PM
Originally posted by jesuskingofpeace
Well, you are denying the existence of evolution, which is even dumber than any theory that your little brain could think up.

I'm not denying it, I'm questioning it. I'm presenting no alternative theory.

Smapdey
August 7th, 2004, 10:25 PM
Originally posted by Freakonaleash89
The thing that has always puzzled me about evolution is why they haven't found more missing links between animals. If all this evolution took place, you would think there would be some remains of the animals in the intermediate stages.

Okay, okay, look the problem is thus: THEY HAVE FOUND MISSING LINKS.

r3n.d4n73
August 7th, 2004, 10:57 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Sources moron? Accredited sources?

:rolleyes:

DanTheMan
August 7th, 2004, 11:01 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Okay, okay, look the problem is thus: THEY HAVE FOUND MISSING LINKS.

Really? Where?

Smapdey
August 7th, 2004, 11:35 PM
Like the ground and stuff.

You guys are thinking of the link between humans and apes. That we don't have. But for a lot of other animals, yeah, we have those.

jesuskingofpeace
August 8th, 2004, 11:03 AM
we actually do, but people who don't understand biological classification don't understand that evolutionary biologists have classified these as a subspecies which then turns into homo sapien.

Source: "Climbing Mount Improbable" By Richard Dawkins

Smapdey
August 8th, 2004, 11:23 AM
Originally posted by jesuskingofpeace
we actually do, but people who don't understand biological classification don't understand that evolutionary biologists have classified these as a subspecies which then turns into homo sapien.

Source: "Climbing Mount Improbable" By Richard Dawkins

You're talking about homo erectus and such and such, I think that these people are refering to the one animal that really does link us between apes and humans. Last I heard, we don't have that. Remember, we're still evolving too, it takes millions of years, and another race is going to some day replace us.

TheKua
August 9th, 2004, 07:23 AM
cockroaches come to mind.

jesuskingofpeace
August 9th, 2004, 03:58 PM
You are all wrong. We are, in fact, de-evolving.

evidence: freakonaleash

Smapdey
August 9th, 2004, 04:03 PM
Originally posted by jesuskingofpeace
You are all wrong. We are, in fact, de-evolving.

evidence: freakonaleash

LOL! Oh man, that's so true!

TheKua
August 10th, 2004, 05:46 AM
Originally posted by jesuskingofpeace
You are all wrong. We are, in fact, de-evolving.

evidence: freakonaleash

:D

JerraMaya
August 10th, 2004, 03:09 PM
ok this topic is going no where you Cunts

jesuskingofpeace
August 10th, 2004, 06:09 PM
Originally posted by JerraMaya
ok this topic is going no where you Cunts

ok, make it go somewhere.

karny
August 10th, 2004, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by jesuskingofpeace
ok, make it go somewhere.

I vote your mum... i'd love to give her a GOING ;)

JerraMaya
August 10th, 2004, 08:45 PM
Originally posted by karny
I vote your mum... i'd love to give her a GOING ;)
lol :)

matt_ville
September 24th, 2004, 09:00 AM
Of course evolutionary biologists are a bunch of twits,I mean people who resort to being biologists are either

a) too stupid to do physics
b) to clumsy to do chemistry
c) just plain retarded

of course there have been some geat biologists. Charles Darwin was one.If youre looking for proof of evolution.Go to the Galapagos islands.Evolution sped up 7 times normal.

And to the answer will science triumph over god.No.Will god triumph over science.No.There will be no victor.Why ? because our galaxy is DOOMED .. BYE BYE ..In a few hundred (or maybe thousand) million years time the milky way galaxy and andromeda will collide.Head on.The two are already moving against each other.The only hope of survival is the eventual depopulation of the milky way galaxy.
Ultimately religion drives science and science drives religion find out more about religion.Science and religion are one.The big-bang and creation.Basically the same thing.Impossible.For creation to happen god existed.For the big bang to happen you need infinite mass and infinite density and infinite temperature.Also logically impossible.

Think about it.

Smapdey
September 24th, 2004, 05:01 PM
I think you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

matt_ville
September 24th, 2004, 08:25 PM
and i think you are fucked in the head

cr3am
September 24th, 2004, 08:56 PM
Lemme point something out to you fucktards that are screaming for a missing link:

If they were an intermediate species between apes and humans, but are gone now, obviously they didn't do too well. They weren't fucking thriving... hence the need for nature to help them evolve. What does this have to do with anything? If there weren't many to begin with, how fucking easy do you expect it to be to find remains of that species?



And since I missed this threat until now, let me say this:
Religion poses answers to questions that have yet to become answered. Once science can give us an answer, the religious fucks hide behind their Bibles and yell "Bullshit", but nobody will listen.

cr3am
September 24th, 2004, 08:59 PM
Originally posted by matt_ville
And to the answer will science triumph over god.No.Will god triumph over science.No.There will be no victor.Why ? because our galaxy is DOOMED .. BYE BYE ..In a few hundred (or maybe thousand) million years time the milky way galaxy and andromeda will collide.Head on.The two are already moving against each other.The only hope of survival is the eventual depopulation of the milky way galaxy. You're calling biologists retards when you read some crappy little article on the internet about two galaxies colliding "head on"?

- I hope you realize there is no "head on" for galaxies
- How the hell are two galaxies going to collide? A galaxy isn't an object, it's a collection of objects. There's a fuckload of empty space between the stars, in case you haven't noticed. Sure, the gravity might fuck with us, but who the hell are you to tell us everything is going to die in the two galaxies?


Now let's move on to your crap logic:Originally posted by matt_ville
For creation to happen god existed.For the big bang to happen you need infinite mass and infinite density and infinite temperature.Also logically impossible. Infinite mass? So you're saying that there's an infinite amount of mass in the universe? Maybe you can't count it, but that's not the definition of infinite.
You think there was infinite density? Well, if there was infinite mass, there would be infinite density, so your logic at least matches up with itself.
Infinite temperature? Wtf does that mean? Once the thermometer in the pinpoint reached infinite it said "oh fuck, here we go!"?
Maybe you don't realize this, but really really big numbers aren't infinite.

You're an idiot. Looks like you're bound to be a biologist.

Darz
September 24th, 2004, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Remember, we're still evolving too, it takes millions of years, and another race is going to some day replace us.

Actually I don't think humans will evolve anymore if evolution works through natural selection. If everyone lives, then how do the best of our species thrive over the 'lesser' of our species. I think we are stuck as we are right now since even the weak and stupid survive and reproduce. I guess there is always the chance that in the future we will be able to manipulate DNA, or we will become more machine than human.

JerraMaya
September 25th, 2004, 02:26 AM
Originally posted by Darz
we will become more machine than human.
I agree with this Point
People might start working like machines

LynX
September 25th, 2004, 05:42 AM
Science will continue because humanity progresses, and is never static. Belief in science is for people who need something tangible to believe in, something they can see and know is true.

Religion will continue because humanity always wants a constant, even if the religion changes in subtle ways, it will remain the same at its core. Belief in religion is for people who need to believe in something that science cannot fulfill: "spiritual" peace of mind, whether imagined or no. Because, what the mind perceives as real, becomes a reality for that person.

Smapdey
September 25th, 2004, 11:04 AM
Well, technically, humans should not evolve thanks to Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. However, think about the fact that races are still going to be moving across the globe, and that we will eventually reach for the stars.

Matt, could you please explain where you got these crack pot theories from? Or is it just you that made this idiot shit up?

TopSecretBoy
September 26th, 2004, 07:42 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Well, technically, humans should not evolve thanks to Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.

The Weinberg Equilibrium doesn't apply to mutation. Humans can still evolve/mutate.

Smapdey
September 26th, 2004, 08:13 PM
True, but why would we mutate? We can do it all for ourselves with Technology?

TopSecretBoy
September 26th, 2004, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
True, but why would we mutate? We can do it all for ourselves with Technology?

Hehe. I guess that's what makes us humans so damned differant, eh?

Hitman
September 27th, 2004, 12:37 AM
No such thing as science and religion, they both mix in harmony.



*goes back to making his female robot that has a vagina and is capable of being pregnant*

TheKua
September 27th, 2004, 03:57 AM
Originally posted by Hitman
No such thing as science and religion, they both mix in harmony.



*goes back to making his female robot that has a vagina and is capable of being pregnant*

why would you want it to get pregnant?

matt_ville
September 27th, 2004, 04:13 AM
so if we dnt like the child we can turn it off

Smapdey
September 27th, 2004, 06:47 AM
We can already do that. Many parents in the states do. It's called ADD and Ritalin.

TheKua
September 27th, 2004, 06:53 AM
Originally posted by Smapdey
We can already do that. Many parents in the states do. It's called ADD and Ritalin.

isnt it easier to flick a switch?

matt_ville
September 27th, 2004, 07:15 AM
i suppose after you "off" the child if you get bored you could switch it back on again .. i dont think ritalin&ADD let you do that

Smapdey
September 27th, 2004, 07:22 AM
Originally posted by matt_ville
i suppose after you "off" the child if you get bored you could switch it back on again .. i dont think ritalin&ADD let you do that

Yeah, just call up and cancel the scrip.

matt_ville
September 27th, 2004, 08:01 AM
no i mean like if you do ritalin it just umm shuts them up they still eat and live and stuff.. if you coul OFF the kid it wouldnt comsume resources at all .. something liek furby ..just that it doesnt forget.."the perfect child"play with it when u want.flip and switch and put it in storage when you dont

bxx
September 30th, 2004, 09:02 AM
riddle me this batman, if no creatures are as close to god as we are, why should we not be alowed to act like god ourselves?

matt_ville
October 1st, 2004, 03:12 AM
but humans do play god (not that its bad) ..our so called science .. with enough money and resources .. we could destroy the planet and move to mars .. and all of gods creations .. can be destroyed by us.. in some sense humans play god

Hitman
October 1st, 2004, 09:28 AM
We should play caveman and make all women our slaves, again.. also release the cures for all stds so we can fuck at will... or not.

Smapdey
October 1st, 2004, 09:39 AM
Two dumbest posts ever.

Chimera[NL]
October 1st, 2004, 10:17 AM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Two dumbest posts ever.

You see? That's why I simply love my ignore-list. There's nothing better than a paki- and hitman-free forum......well except a paki- and hitman-free world offcourse but that's asking for too much.

NiteX
October 1st, 2004, 05:50 PM
We don't want the world to get too boring now do we? There must be the forum idiots or who would get our entertainment from?

Hitman
October 4th, 2004, 01:07 AM
There's nothing better than a paki- and hitman-free forum......well except a paki- and hitman-free world offcourse but that's asking for too much.


Awww.. we have a crying baby onboard.. save me your tears missy.

Smapdey
October 4th, 2004, 01:15 AM
Yeah, you got him good there. Why don't you tell us some more of your "war stories" or better yet, talk about whatever "girl" you "fucked" "last night"? Those are always a riot.

Hitman
October 4th, 2004, 02:48 AM
Woohoo.. now I have Smap, Chims cheerleader one my nuts also.. yeah you guys rock.. continue as you may but I never loose to cheerleaders.

I won't even bother with you, your post count says it all loser.. if the Fab2 of you think you can scare me away from AT like you did some other punks then think harder.. and good luck.


Woohoo.

Chimera[NL]
October 4th, 2004, 03:06 AM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Yeah, you got him good there. Why don't you tell us some more of your "war stories" or better yet, talk about whatever "girl" you "fucked" "last night"? Those are always a riot.

I'd like to hear Civic stories. You know where he's ridin' on DUUUBS, checkin out the hoodrats, blingblingen' his way like a true playah.

Smapdey
October 4th, 2004, 10:30 AM
Don't mess with him chimmy! He's gonna kick our E-Asses! I bet you that he'll refer to us as kids next! See, despite the fact that we're smarter than he is, he has to try to take us down a peg by refering to our ages. JerraMaya does it all the time.

I believe the Classic poet Catullus said it best: Fugit te, inepte.

Chimera[NL]
October 4th, 2004, 11:39 AM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Don't mess with him chimmy! He's gonna kick our E-Asses! I bet you that he'll refer to us as kids next! See, despite the fact that we're smarter than he is, he has to try to take us down a peg by refering to our ages. JerraMaya does it all the time.

I believe the Classic poet Catullus said it best: Fugit te, inepte.

The funny thing is that J is only 2 years older than me. Not to mention the fact that he has the mental level of a 5 year old. But I will watch out nonetheless, you never know what "ownage" may happen. I mean before you know it they start calling me a fool, kid or even better a "FAG". Yeah some good times are ahead, that's for sure. Too bad my ignore-list has set my forum to "Idiot-free"

Hitman
October 4th, 2004, 04:10 PM
Yeah you 2 homos keep riding my nuts.. when you decide to get a life let me know. Try starting with talking to females and stop harassing males, yeah that's a good start.. chumps.

Smapdey
October 4th, 2004, 06:30 PM
Chim and I never ever talk to girls ever. In fact, we hate women. We're buying a farm in Idaho and getting married in June. Please come to the Ceremony.

karny
October 4th, 2004, 06:48 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Chim and I never ever talk to girls ever. In fact, we hate women. We're buying a farm in Idaho and getting married in June. Please come to the Ceremony.

Is there cake?

TopSecretBoy
October 4th, 2004, 06:49 PM
Will there be free punch?

Smapdey
October 4th, 2004, 07:05 PM
Well duh.

karny
October 4th, 2004, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
Well duh.

Wow dude you really know how to throw a homosexual party!

Downfall
October 4th, 2004, 07:25 PM
dont drink the coolaid

cr3am
October 4th, 2004, 09:30 PM
It's too bad, this was a pretty good thread.

Smapdey
October 4th, 2004, 10:16 PM
Yeah, true dat. Sorry folks.