View Full Version : Proof XBOX>PS2 (like you need it)
cr3am
April 6th, 2003, 10:53 PM
PLAYSTATION2 VERSION
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2003/ps2/splintercell/0404/s_screen009.jpg
XBOX VERSION
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2003/news/03/06/kolacell/kolacell_screen001.jpg
RAY16
April 6th, 2003, 11:00 PM
This thread isn't really needed. Anybody with a brain can compare the specs of the Xbox and PS2 to see if its better or not. And if you are going to compare screens of a multiplatform game, find a screen of the smae location on both platforms. That way you can point out which console does whatever feature that looks nice in the screen better.
future man
April 6th, 2003, 11:02 PM
thats fugly man
cr3am
April 6th, 2003, 11:14 PM
Originally posted by RAY16
And if you are going to compare screens of a multiplatform game, find a screen of the smae location on both platforms. That way you can point out which console does whatever feature that looks nice in the screen better. wanted to :\ damn gamespot
BUT LOOK AT THE JAGGEDIES!!!!
and the HUD on xbox version is better too
Yian
April 7th, 2003, 12:45 AM
Here I'm gonna do an analysis:
1) XBox looks bettter...
2) PS2 looks like shit...
3) People buy what they like the most...
4) PS2 sells better than XBOX in America...
so the conclusion is:
Americans like shit.
cr3am
April 7th, 2003, 01:00 AM
hey hey hey, i've never liked Shit
Odm
April 7th, 2003, 08:45 AM
I thought SaintDL was from Asia... will Splinter Cell be available for Gamecube? (Ed- Never mind, I found out myself. It is coming out...)
http://www.atrip.net/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=9659
sushi128
April 7th, 2003, 06:39 PM
does XBOX have devil may cry though.......does it???
ok, back to more concrete logic....
PS2 has a larger library of games. People like being able to choose from a wider range, even if half of em are crap :)
and XBOX, being newer, supports many graphic features that the PS2 doesn't have. thing is....the PS2 is older.
oh, and i play splinter cell on PC anyway. looks SO much better than that xbox there :D
Smapdey
April 7th, 2003, 07:13 PM
If you want to play some good console gaming, get a Gamecube, if you want to play some good PC gaming, get a computer, not an Xbox.
STDStud
April 7th, 2003, 07:15 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
If you want to play some good console gaming, get a Gamecube, if you want to play some good PC gaming, get a computer, not an Xbox.
Heeeere we go again....... :rolleyes:
cr3am
April 7th, 2003, 08:00 PM
Originally posted by Smapdey
If you want to play some good console gaming, get a Gamecube, if you want to play some good PC gaming, get a computer, not an Xbox. stfu about GC.
Hobbes874
April 7th, 2003, 09:20 PM
Originally posted by cr3am
stfu about GC.
i could say the same to you about the xbox
sushi128
April 7th, 2003, 09:24 PM
this is a console discussion forum......feel free to discuss consoles :)
Ohell
April 8th, 2003, 08:24 AM
I don't have a ps2 or xbox but I have played many games on both and from what I can see there is not a huge difference. That's not to say there isn't one. Xbox definitely looks better. Just not a whole helluva lot, but enough that you can see a difference. But guess what, you can only tell if you are looking for it. Most of the time I was too busy playing the damn games to notice.
Now for the second half of my two cents. What I said shouldn't surprise anyone. Of course xbox has the graphics edge on ps2. They waited longer to put it out so they had access to newer hardware.
Example. Several months ago I decided my Geforce2 wasn't cutting it anymore. I could buy a 4600ti but the 9700 was coming so I waited. It finally came out and was a hands-down hit but, the Gefoce Fx was coming soon and I knew it would be better so I waited. That one eventually came out and, well we all know what it turned out to be, but by now the 9800 had been announced and, etc etc etc.
My point is this. Eventually you have to draw your line in the sand and make your choice. There is always something revolutionary right around the corner. If xbox and psx kept waiting for better hardware than what the other had, then we would have neither.
IkYiolul
April 8th, 2003, 11:57 PM
Fuck consoles...
NuclearWhale
April 9th, 2003, 01:42 AM
I have my xbox mainly just so my friends have something to play when they are over, or for the multiplayer support. Though I do get the single player game now and then. Consoles just dont live up to what the PC can do, but most people in the world arent smart enough to run them so they fall back to consoles :P
Hobbes874
April 9th, 2003, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by IkYiolul
Fuck consoles...
exactly!
future man
April 9th, 2003, 11:11 PM
ive seen that pic somewhere
cr3am
April 10th, 2003, 10:14 AM
Originally posted by Hobbes874
i could say the same to you about the xbox do you see GC in the title?
aphremen
April 10th, 2003, 02:11 PM
Yeah, right next to X-box...it reads...GC=X-box, X-box>PS2. also, X-box/PS2<GC. GC+PS2>X-box. ah, i know! X-box+GC>PS2+DC. This is one of those threads where grownups say "why bother saying one sucks and one kicks ass, when you can live on ramen for a month and buy all three?". Well, why not? I don't think I could live in a world where I couldn't play Socom (NO FREAKING AIMBOTS!) Auto Modellista, Wind Wanker, Rogue Leader, Metroid Prime, DOA 3, and DOA Beach Volleyball. Not to mention all the PC games.
Obviously PS2's graphics suck, but you'll have to wait to play GTA:VC on it. Obviously GC barely has any games, but where else are you gonna play Nintendo properties and 4-player bomberman?! Obviously, the X-box is inherently evil since it is a m$ product, and has not all that many games, but it's almost as good as your PC probably is, and Team Ninja Apparently isn't developing for any other platform. Not to mention you can listen to MP3s while playing games and whatnot.
Smapdey
April 10th, 2003, 07:11 PM
PS2 has way more games out for it than Xbox.
cr3am
April 10th, 2003, 07:21 PM
wow, now i can see that years of mathematics has paid off in this one.
aphremen
April 10th, 2003, 07:29 PM
Well, mathmetitians are still trying to find out if (GC+X-box)PS2=PC. Where PC=value of $3,000 or more.
RAY16
April 10th, 2003, 08:47 PM
aphremen, you are confusing the hell out of me.
cr3am
April 10th, 2003, 09:32 PM
that's the point ray... i think
Downfall
April 10th, 2003, 10:55 PM
i like confusion..it makes me think clearer
aphremen
April 11th, 2003, 02:36 AM
I am confusing even myself! :) It is fun!
RAY16
April 11th, 2003, 02:10 PM
PS2 has way more games out for it than Xbox.
More games = more crap you have to sift through before you get to the good stuff.
aphremen
April 11th, 2003, 09:37 PM
But, you gotta figure that if 10% of all games for one system are good that means there are more good games for PS2.
[edit] again, not being all "my console is the best" obviously, x-box is far superior. But right now, I have only 3 x-box games that I don't want to trade in, but I have 10 PS2 games and 9 GC games that I don't want to trade in. I mean, don't take me wrong, Halo, beach volleyball, and UC are great but...IS there anything great besides them?
RAY16
April 12th, 2003, 01:43 PM
I mean, don't take me wrong, Halo, beach volleyball, and UC are great but...IS there anything great besides them?
There will be soon.
sushi128
April 12th, 2003, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by RAY16
More games = more crap you have to sift through before you get to the good stuff.
"good" stuff is subjective. one man's crap is another man's gold, which is why i believe a large library is neccessary. some people thought daikatana was good, right? :)
Yian
April 12th, 2003, 05:01 PM
hehehe... if MS is evil enough, soon Halh-Life 2, Doom III, and many others will be XBox Only... do you guys want that happen? XBox is surely great but their competition is hurting the PC games:
PS2 siezed the market quickly by defeating GameCube, and XBox tried to jump into the market to beat PS2 with, uh, fewer games, bigger controllers (not a good thing), heavier and bigger machines, and more expensive price... it did nothing but strengthen the PS2's already established foundation.
Then all the console game developers jumped onto the boat of PS2 because it is big now, and they will surely get paid off their efforts because they know there are more people out there gonna play the game...
Then no one is willing to make games for XBox! So, MS just have to dig the pc game developers to make the game X-Box Exclusive... then PC gamers are kind of fucked.
RAY16
April 12th, 2003, 06:38 PM
DOOM III will probably suck, ID isn't known for good stories. The graphics will be amazing, but i seriously dout the story will be good. IMO they should of handed it to Raven software, they own. Quake 4 will kick ass because Raven is doing it. Sure, Ravens games are not the end all, be all of games but non of them have been complete crap. Every Raven game i've played has been either good or great.
future man
April 12th, 2003, 06:50 PM
In the words of SaintDL "I fuck you all".
sushi128
April 12th, 2003, 07:01 PM
you don't play doom for the storyline. like watchin austin powers for plot. u play doom for graphics and gameplay; and judging by the ::cough:: "demo", i'm willing to bet it's gonna be one hell of a shooting range (we need games like serious sam once in a while, don't we?).
RAY16
April 12th, 2003, 08:49 PM
Yeah, but I think that DOOM is one of those games that deserves a good story. Its a good idea for a game, it could be the next system shock or Half-Life (I hate Half-Life, but many people like it so i used it as an example). DOOM III will be scary and fun, but the fun-factor and scaryness could be doubled with a dark and compelling story.
Smapdey
April 12th, 2003, 09:17 PM
Doom 3 might have a good story. Remember, John Carmack said that we should not make any judgement based on that leaked alpha. It will be scary as hell though.
Doom 3 will come out on PC. There's too much engine work, lots of game dev's already using the engine, they have to stick out there.
RAY16
April 12th, 2003, 09:41 PM
I havn't played the alpha, i'm just guessing it won't have a good story because of ID's track record. None of thier games have ad a great story, thats why they didn't give Quake 3 any story at all, just a single player ladder.
Smapdey
April 12th, 2003, 10:30 PM
It was Quake dude, give me a break. A lot of games using the engine have had awesome storylines.
RAY16
April 12th, 2003, 10:51 PM
A lot of games using the engine have had awesome storylines.
Yes, there are games that use the quake engine that have great story lines. But not any of them were developed by ID, unless of course RCTW was made by ID, then that gives them one game. I'm not sure who made it though.
future man
April 13th, 2003, 12:18 AM
I think DOOM III will rape you in yer ass, thats what i think.
aphremen
April 13th, 2003, 04:13 AM
yes, doom ]|[ ownz joo all.
sushi128
April 13th, 2003, 01:29 PM
besides, there's hardly a better storyline than the ol' "last man alive so go down fightin and take every last one of those hell spawn fuckers down with you" deal. it can be thought of as motivation :D