View Full Version : CNC GENERALS Vs CNC RED ALERT 2
Dashing Boy
April 30th, 2003, 08:56 AM
What do u think?
JerraMaya
April 30th, 2003, 02:16 PM
C&C Generals , it also has alot of skermish maps 2 download 2 from different websites
Colorblind
April 30th, 2003, 04:11 PM
Red Alert 2 by far. Much better story, better characters, and the 3d thing sucks, I wish they wouldn't make RTS games which allow me to see a total of 4 tanks before the screen is filled up.. yeesh!
RAY16
April 30th, 2003, 06:02 PM
Red Alert 2 by far. Much better story, better characters, and the 3d thing sucks, I wish they wouldn't make RTS games which allow me to see a total of 4 tanks before the screen is filled up.. yeesh!
3D is the future, you're just mad because your computer can't handle it, or you are stuck in the 90s when 2D was "Da bomb!".
Colorblind
April 30th, 2003, 06:12 PM
Err, well, I just think that PC RTS games don't do as well 3D because they don't capture the scope of the battlefield. I didn't like Age of Mythology either, in fact, the only 3D RTS I liked was released like 3 years ago.. cant remember the name... oh and my computer specs:
AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (2.0 GHZ)
512mb DDR 333
GeForce 4 Ti 4600
120GB WD Special Edition
Sony DRU-500a DVD burner (I think that's the model #)
Sony 40x12x32 CD Burner
Onboard sound (all other sound cards I've used don't work, including SB Audigy)
450Watt Truepower supply
3com Hardware Fax/Data modem
Logitech MX700 Mouse
Windows XP PRO
Sony 21' Trinitron Monitor
As posted in the post your computer specs thread ;) :) :)
ReDeeMeR
April 30th, 2003, 08:11 PM
Generals, I'm really sick of all that Nato vs Comunit Russia.
Colorblind
April 30th, 2003, 09:18 PM
lol Generals is just NATO vs. Iraq :P
ReDeeMeR
May 2nd, 2003, 06:08 PM
No, generals is US vs Iraq/Afghanistan vs Commie China
Colorblind
May 2nd, 2003, 09:44 PM
Oppppps I meant U.N. + U.S. Vs. Iraq (yes, if you look carefully, some of the U.S. units SAY U.N. on them).
Mr. Technicallity.. jeezus
Slave2Sodom
May 2nd, 2003, 10:59 PM
damn ive been trying to play C&CG for days now, ive installed and re-installed 3 times, troubleshot and even updated my drivers, every time i try to start the game it just kicks me back to desktop and won't even start the game, im running Direct-X 8.1 and my video card is 32mb AGP, i know i have enough physical memory i really don't know what the problem is, the build on my video card is S3 Graphics ProSavageDDR, i just bought my computer this way, if i need another card i'll go get one, but i wanted to make sure before i ran out and spent 150-190$ getting something i may not need, help if you can
mike
ReDeeMeR
May 2nd, 2003, 11:54 PM
Originally posted by Colorblind
Oppppps I meant U.N. + U.S. Vs. Iraq (yes, if you look carefully, some of the U.S. units SAY U.N. on them).
Mr. Technicallity.. jeezus
Ya, well there's a lil difference between NATO and U.N. :rollseyes:
Originally posted by Slave2Sodom
damn ive been trying to play C&CG for days now, ive installed and re-installed 3 times, troubleshot and even updated my drivers, every time i try to start the game it just kicks me back to desktop and won't even start the game, im running Direct-X 8.1 and my video card is 32mb AGP, i know i have enough physical memory i really don't know what the problem is, the build on my video card is S3 Graphics ProSavageDDR, i just bought my computer this way, if i need another card i'll go get one, but i wanted to make sure before i ran out and spent 150-190$ getting something i may not need, help if you can
mike
Well try looking in readme file, I'm pretty sure your vid card isnt officialy supported... and on the side note how does it run on that thing?
Slave2Sodom
May 2nd, 2003, 11:59 PM
the game doesnt run at all, on my computer back home i have an nvidia geforce 2 mmx 400 and c&cg runs just fine, im assuming its my graphics card giving me the woes here, im trying to find out if my AGP slot is 4x or 8x so i can determine what new card to buy, im thinking one of the higher end Nvidia chipsets
Colorblind
May 3rd, 2003, 07:25 AM
No kidding, but it's a video game for crying out loud...
Do you have a stick up your ass ReDeeMeR? For the time I've known you, you've never been nice (I'm Akitostorm from the old comments)
SaintDL
May 3rd, 2003, 11:27 AM
IMO, americans who love their country should hate Generals. because they find themselve sucky in that game. the tanks are something... but the cash flow comes in slow.
ReDeeMeR
May 3rd, 2003, 05:25 PM
Originally posted by Colorblind
No kidding, but it's a video game for crying out loud...
Do you have a stick up your ass ReDeeMeR? For the time I've known you, you've never been nice (I'm Akitostorm from the old comments)
No, I think it's the other way around with the stick being in the ass, I was just trying to explain that there's a difference between U.N and NATO ;)
Yian
May 3rd, 2003, 05:32 PM
This is so weird that US don't have nukes in Generals... US was the one that inveted it! Can't they at least give US some depleted uranium warhead? Or some tactical nukes, you know, the ones that do no radiation but huge explosions...
WhoGivesARatsAss
May 3rd, 2003, 11:08 PM
Red alert 2 was ok but generals rocks..
Hitman
May 4th, 2003, 08:11 PM
Generals.. it's newer, the graphics are better and it runs smooth as panties coming off my women.
ReDeeMeR
May 5th, 2003, 10:48 AM
Originally posted by Yian
This is so weird that US don't have nukes in Generals... US was the one that inveted it! Can't they at least give US some depleted uranium warhead? Or some tactical nukes, you know, the ones that do no radiation but huge explosions...
Well US just copied Nazie nuke plans from what I know, besides US wouldnt use nukes, because they are illegal on civilized world.
You buttheads have that mother bomb or whatever it is.
Colorblind
May 5th, 2003, 12:07 PM
We've got the Ion Cannon (hahahahaha..) and carpet bombers, along with the A-10 strike.. The U.S. Air Force in Generals can take on the world without any ground forces.
btw.. alright redemmer, we thought the other person was being stingy, oh well, I'm not pissed ;P
Odm
May 5th, 2003, 12:21 PM
Originally posted by ReDeeMeR
Well US just copied Nazie nuke plans from what I know, besides US wouldnt use nukes, because they are illegal on civilized world.
You buttheads have that mother bomb or whatever it is. It's the other way round, to my knowledge, someone passed secrets to the Germans, but the US got the bomb first. Maybe they both copied each other's plans...
ReDeeMeR
May 5th, 2003, 02:06 PM
No, US took over Berlin and took the plans, then Ruskies found out you buttheads got them first and got all pissed off and basically that's where the crazy race(who will have more nukes) began.
Everything came from Europe biotches, you'll just have to deal with it :D
Odm
May 5th, 2003, 02:16 PM
Hehe, I'm half-European so calm down...
ReDeeMeR
May 5th, 2003, 04:10 PM
lol :D
RADiator
May 5th, 2003, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by ReDeeMeR
Everything came from Europe biotches, you'll just have to deal with it :D YEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Odm
May 6th, 2003, 07:50 AM
Originally posted by ReDeeMeR
Everything came from Europe biotches, you'll just have to deal with it :D Even the modern lightbulb comes from Europe! It was a European who devised the idea of using tungsten (coiled twice to make it extra bright) in Edison's lightbulb. Edison used carbon.
ReDeeMeR
May 6th, 2003, 04:41 PM
Btw, I'm not being racistic or anything here! :D
sushi128
May 6th, 2003, 04:51 PM
i think the germans developed the bomb, but had nowhere near enough funds to get the required uranium (only 1 part in....150 exists naturally. the rest is u-239 or 238). so that little stubby guy with the "flood victim" hair-do came over ehre, wrote a letter to the white house, and we had enough money to make the reactors to get our u-235.